Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?
> * Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> [001028 11:34]:
>> Applied. Thanks.
Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce?
Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist,
but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable
(non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for
several releases past.
regards, tom lane
