On Wed, Aug 14, 2024, at 13:01, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> The proposed patch adds get_bytes() and set_bytes() functions. The
> semantics is similar to get_byte() and set_byte() we already have but
> the functions operate with bigints rather than bytes and the user can
> specify the size of the integer. This allows working with int2s,
> int4s, int8s or even int5s if needed.
+1
I wanted this myself many times.
I wonder if get_bytes() and set_bytes() will behave differently
on little-endian vs big-endian systems?
If so, then I think it would be nice to enforce a consistent byte order
(e.g., big-endian), to ensure consistent behavior across platforms.
Regards,
Joel
