Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Leonardo F
Subject Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
Date
Msg-id 788271.67623.qm@web29002.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch
List pgsql-hackers
> > So my proposal would be: do the test seq_scan vs sort/index_scan only for
> > regular btree index, and integrate that test in the planner.
>
> Keep in mind that this patch was after the deadline for 9.0, so there
> is probably not a huge rush to get this done.


That's true; I'll try to get the whole thing done then...





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Joseph Krogh
Date:
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0
Next
From: "Huda Booley (huda@careerjunction.co.za)"
Date:
Subject: Standby server lagging behind