Re: Online checksums patch - once again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Gustafsson
Subject Re: Online checksums patch - once again
Date
Msg-id 78758C8D-9F6C-4D73-8A4A-E48283DD434F@yesql.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Online checksums patch - once again  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> On 24 Sep 2020, at 06:27, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 02:34:36PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> While in the patch I realized that the relationlist saved the relkind but the
>> code wasn't actually using it, so I've gone ahead and removed that with a lot
>> fewer palloc calls as a result. The attached v22 fixes that and the above.
>
> Some of the TAP tests are blowing up here, as the CF bot is telling:
> t/003_standby_checksum.pl .. 1/11 # Looks like you planned 11 tests but ran 4.
> # Looks like your test exited with 29 just after 4.
> t/003_standby_checksum.pl .. Dubious, test returned 29 (wstat 7424, 0x1d00)

Interesting, I've been unable to trigger a fault and the latest Travis build
was green.  I'll continue to try and see if I can shake something loose.

cheers ./daniel




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Range checks of pg_test_fsync --secs-per-test and pg_test_timing --duration
Next
From: Katsuragi Yuta
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add features to pg_stat_statements