Re: proclock table corrupted - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: proclock table corrupted
Date
Msg-id 7874.1338223721@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: proclock table corrupted  (Harshitha S <hershetha@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Harshitha S <hershetha@gmail.com> writes:
> Sorry, the OS is WindRiver Linux.

What I would suspect first is issues with the MIPS spinlock assembly
code (look into s_lock.h) not being portable to your platform.  That
code hasn't been tested on very many machines, I suspect.  It's not
impossible that it doesn't work at all on multiprocessor machines;
is yours one?

> Yes , I am taking of the fast path locking patch discussed in the link
> below.
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/bug-in-fast-path-locking-td5626629.html

Not relevant to 9.0.x, for sure.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails
Next
From: Karl Denninger
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Attempting to do a rolling move to 9.2Beta (as a slave) fails