Physical column size - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Paul Mackay
Subject Physical column size
Date
Msg-id 786c2f6d0601260206k2201a548p48af7c7fc085d3b2@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Physical column size
List pgsql-performance
Hi,

I've created a table like this :
CREATE TABLE tmp_A (
c "char",
i int4
);

And another one
CREATE TABLE tmp_B (
i int4,
ii int4
);

I then inerted a bit more than 19 million rows in each table (exactly the same number of rows in each).

The end result is that the physical size on disk used by table tmp_A is exactly the same as table tmp_B (as revealed by the pg_relation_size function) ! Given that a "char" field is supposed to be 1 byte in size and a int4 4 bytes, shouldn't the tmp_A use a smaller disk space ? Or is it that any value, whatever the type, requires at least 4 bytes to be stored ?

Thanks,
Paul

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Lor
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL Solaris packages now in beta
Next
From: Mario Weilguni
Date:
Subject: Re: Physical column size