On Thu, 2020-05-14 at 15:11 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> LGTM. I have slightly modified the commit message, see if that looks
> fine to you.
Fine with me, thanks.
> This breaks the cases where a REPEATABLE READ transaction could see an
> empty table if it repeats a COPY statement and somebody truncated the
> table in the meantime.
I would use "case" rather than "cases" here.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
