Re: GiST operator class for bool - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: GiST operator class for bool
Date
Msg-id 784a632a-b2ab-8a31-fdc7-96b4c7f63a0e@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: GiST operator class for bool  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: GiST operator class for bool
List pgsql-hackers
On 11/3/21 16:18, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I looked at this patch today - it's pretty simple and in pretty good
> shape, I can't think of anything that'd need fixing. Perhaps the test
> might also do EXPLAIN like for other types, to verify the new index is
> actually used. But that's minor enough to handle during commit.
> 
> 
> I've marked this as RFC and will get it committed in a day or two.
> 

Pushed, after adding some simple EXPLAIN to the regression test.

Thanks for the patch!


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: lastOverflowedXid does not handle transaction ID wraparound