On 2024/10/11 17:06, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2024/10/11 16:18, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:44:43 +0800
>> px shi <spxlyy123@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Materialized view is introduced by 3bf3ab8c563 and at that UNLOGGED was
>>>> allowed, and it is disallowed by another commit 3223b25ff73. However,
>>>> it seems that the tab-complement is missed to fixed.
>>
>> Sorry, the comment above was not correct.
>> The fix was about pasl's \d meta-command, not tab-complement.
>>
>> - if (tableinfo.relpersistence == 'u')
>> - printfPQExpBuffer(&title, _("Unlogged materialized view \"%s.%s\""),
>> - schemaname, relationname);
>> - else
>> - printfPQExpBuffer(&title, _("Materialized view \"%s.%s\""),
>> - schemaname, relationname);
>> + printfPQExpBuffer(&title, _("Materialized view \"%s.%s\""),
>> +
>>
>> "Unlogged materialized view" is never printed since it cannot be created from the beginning
>> of materialized view support, so this is a dead code to be removed.
>
> Yes. I initially thought this code was kept intentionally because
> some older PostgreSQL versions supported unlogged materialized views,
> and even the latest psql might need to display them. However,
> this isn't the case. Unlogged materialized views were added and
> removed before the v9.3 release and were never supported in
> any official release. So there seems no need to keep this code.
I've pushed the patch. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
