> didn't Tom have an objection to this, or, at least, a concern about
> forcing v2 specs?
>>
>> Oh, I remember now. Tom Lane was saying that we should vote if we want
>> v2 or v3 specs for ODBC. He said moving to v3 in beta may be a problem,
>> and you said this can be easily backed out, so I applied it. I think we
>> are stuck with v2 anyway.
I agree, we probably need to stick with the v2 spec for now. I just
wanted to see if anyone thought that changing the reported version
number would be a better patch ;-)
regards, tom lane
