Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alan Li
Subject Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
Date
Msg-id 782056770906212342n2e04c3b7k5987b6e59a1f8374@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: 8.4 open item: copy performance regression?
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Tom,

How much concern is there for the contention for use cases where the WAL can't be bypassed?

Thanks, Alan

On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> The following copying 3M rows(each) into a seperate table of the same
> database.

Is this with WAL, or bypassing WAL?  Given what we've already seen,
a lot of contention for WALInsertLock wouldn't surprise me much here.
It should be possible to bypass that though.

                       regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: rc tarball built with older flex version?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing Docs for MOVE direction?