Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Date
Msg-id 7817.1029770513@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> You should stop right here and investigate the reason for the crash.

> It's the same reason as before -- i.e. the TEXTOID assertion in
> patternsel(). I just didn't expect to see physical index corruption as a
> result.

Oh really?  Yeah, I'm surprised too (and not happy).  Let's definitely
see that test case...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes