Re: pg_upgrade with large pg_largeobject table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_upgrade with large pg_largeobject table
Date
Msg-id 7806.1534270575@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade with large pg_largeobject table  (Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net>)
List pgsql-general
Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net> writes:
>> Using the large-object API for things that tend to not actually be very
>> large (which they aren't, if you've got hundreds of millions of 'em) is an
>> antipattern, I'm afraid.

> I know :( So maybe I need to do some refactoring in the application and
> inline the lobs. The data is binary data with very high entropy (encrypted
> stuff). Would you recommend bytea for that?

Yeah, it'd likely be less of a pain-in-the-neck than text.  You would need
some sort of encoding anyway to deal with zero bytes and sequences that
aren't valid per your encoding, so you might as well go with bytea's
solution.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mate Varga
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade with large pg_largeobject table
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup failed to read a file