On 8/23/22 1:26 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-08-23 13:18:49 -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> Taking RMT hat off, if the outcome is "revert", I do want to ensure we don't
>> lose momentum on getting this into v16. I know a lot of time and effort has
>> gone into this featureset and it seems to be trending in the right
>> direction. We have a mixed history on reverts in terms of if/when they are
>> committed and I don't want to see that happen to these features. I do think
>> this will remain a headline feature even if we delay it for v16.
>
> We could decide to revert this for 15, but leave it in tree for HEAD.
If it comes to that, I think that is a reasonable suggestion so long as
we're committed to making the requisite changes.
Thanks,
Jonathan
