On 05.04.2017 16:06, Arthur Zakirov wrote:
>
> I'd like to focus on "refevalfunc" and "refnestedfunc" fields as I did
> earlier. I think using Oid type for them is a bad approach. "..._fetch"
> and "..._assign" functions in catalog is unnecessary movement to me.
> User of subscript of his type may think the same. But he won't see the
> code and won't know why he needs these functions.
>
> And so "..._fetch" and "..._assign" functions in catalog is a bad design
> to me. But, of course, it is just my opinion. This approach is the main
> think which we should resolve first, because after commiting the patch
> it will be hard to fix it.
>
I've read olders messages and thread. I see now that this approach was
made with other hackers. I've just been confused when I've been
implementing subscript for ltree.
Sorry if I confused you.
Any opinions about the patch?
--
Arthur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
