Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Lamb
Subject Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid
Date
Msg-id 7779142C-B027-4C17-A67C-A7C220AADF80@slamb.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] Arguments Pro/Contra Software Raid  (Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On May 9, 2006, at 11:26 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Of course not, but which drives lie about sync that are SATA? Or
> more specifically SATA-II?

I don't know the answer to this question, but have you seen this tool?

     http://brad.livejournal.com/2116715.html

It attempts to experimentally determine if, with your operating
system version, controller, and hard disk, fsync() does as claimed.
Of course, experimentation can't prove the system is correct, but it
can sometimes prove the system is broken.

I say it's worth running on any new model of disk, any new
controller, or after the Linux kernel people rewrite everything (i.e.
on every point release).

I have to admit to hypocrisy, though...I'm running with systems that
other people ordered and installed, I doubt they were this thorough,
and I don't have identical hardware to run tests on. So no real way
to do this.

Regards,
Scott

--
Scott Lamb <http://www.slamb.org/>



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Slow C Function
Next
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM killing my CPU