On 10/18/22 01:15, Dave Page wrote:
>
> Regardless of who is managing them, surely the person in charge of
> it should be on this list to be able to answer questions etc.
>
>
> You're suggesting the person in charge of the EDB website should be on
> this mailing list on the off-chance we decide to have a discussion about
> adding an API or file to the EDB site? That seems excessive, given this
> or anything like it has happened once in 15+ years.
No, so they can be part of the conversation period so we don't have to
wait for some intra-company communication/process to take place.
>
> And I'm sure they have the technical skills to publish a json file
> even without your oversight :)
>
>
> Of course they do. The question is one of prioritising the work, which
> unless it's an issue with the download pages not working etc. I have
> very little sway over.
Th solution would be to move these downloads to the PGDG infrastructure
and not have to wait on a company that makes it's money off Postgres
getting around to prioritizing supporting Postgres.
FYI, to be fair I also think the Apt repo not being updated on time is
also bad. A release date is release date. Announcing to the world a
version is available and not have it there is not good.
> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: https://pgsnake.blogspot.com <https://pgsnake.blogspot.com>
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com <https://www.enterprisedb.com>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
