Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm
Date
Msg-id 7764f41f-29f6-428f-b40d-43ba2da38170@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm  (walther@technowledgy.de)
Responses Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm
List pgsql-hackers
On 31.03.24 15:34, walther@technowledgy.de wrote:
>> I'd rather adapt one of the existing tasks, to avoid increasing CI 
>> costs unduly.
> 
> I looked into this and I think the only task that could be changed is 
> the SanityCheck.

I think SanityCheck should run a simple, "average" environment, like the 
current Debian one.  Otherwise, niche problems with musl or multi-arch 
or whatever will throw off the entire build pipeline.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: add function argument names to regex* functions.
Next
From: Wolfgang Walther
Date:
Subject: Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm