Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Date
Msg-id 775.932507366@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Removed:
> * Be smarter about promoting types when UNION merges different data types
> * SELECT ... UNION ... GROUP BY fails if column types disagree
> * INSERT ... SELECT ... UNION is not reliable

> And added:

> * redesign INSERT ... SELECT to have two levels of target list

Er ... wait.  The first two of those TODO items were separate issues.
I think they can be fixed without changing the querytree representation.
The third can be superseded by this item, though.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Another reason to redesign querytree representation