Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords
Date
Msg-id 7749.997932762@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Re: Proposal for encrypting pg_shadow passwords  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> BTW, a protocol version bump for this is a horrid idea.  That will
>> create lots of compatibility problems for people, whether they use
>> the new auth mode or not.

> I thought protocol bumps were the way to handle such things.  The SCM
> patch does it as well.  How should I tell if I am talking to a >=7.2
> client?

You send it the new auth request code and see if it copes or not.
There's no need to bump the overall protocol version, and every reason
*not* to.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Joseph Shraibman
Date:
Subject: patch for 60 seconds bug
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for 60 seconds bug