Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
Date
Msg-id 771900.1727499306@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table  (Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
List pgsql-general
Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 12:39 AM David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Friday, September 27, 2024, Durgamahesh Manne <
>>> Can't we use primary key on singal column(betid) on partitioned table
>>> rather than using composite key (placedon,betid)?

>> No.  It would be misleading to allow such a thing because a unique index
>> can only span a single partition.

> That is IMO a serious (and probably unfixable, given how PG stores tables)
> flaw in PG's partitioning design.

You can call it a flaw if you want, but it's an intentional design
limitation.  The only way to relax it would be to invent global
indexes (that is, single indexes covering the entire partitioning
tree), which would basically throw away every advantage of making
a partitioned structure in the first place.  If that's what you
want, don't partition your table.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Regarding use of single column as primary key on partitioned table
Next
From: Durgamahesh Manne
Date:
Subject: Re: Synchronize the dump with a logical slot with --snapshot