Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date
Msg-id 771696.1778079755@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread
In response to Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
List pgsql-hackers
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> Some of our changes to pg_bsd_indent bumped INDENT_VERSION.  Should we do
> that here?

We already have an INDENT_VERSION bump queued for the
space-between-comma-and-period change.  I don't think we need two
bumps in this cycle, as long as we coordinate pushing these changes.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG] CRASH: ECPGprepared_statement() and ECPGdeallocate_all() when connection is NULL
Next
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: PSA: Planning to grease protocol connections during 19beta