Re: hstore ==> and deprecate => - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date
Msg-id 7715.1276268383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>)
Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>  (Joseph Adams <joeyadams3.14159@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> How about no operator at all?  It won't be as cool to read, but
> consider, the arguments are text and text, not involving any hstore type
> at all, so whatever operator you choose is in practice blocked from
> everyone everywhere.  No one could ever implement another key/value
> system that uses a similar interface.  Or use the operator for anything
> else involving strings.

Yeah, that's a good point.  Maybe we should just deprecate the operator
altogether.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Urbański
Date:
Subject: pg_regress --use-existing does not appear in --help
Next
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers