Re: Compilation errors - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Compilation errors
Date
Msg-id 7686.1172696648@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Compilation errors  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Compilation errors  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Gregory Stark wrote:
>> flex 2.5.33

> Aha! Known to be broken, iirc. Use flex 2.5.4a

No, the known breakages with flex were years ago; 2.5.33 has only been
out a year.  I think 2.5.31 might have been the one we saw big problems
with (there's a note warning against using it on the flex sourceforge
page).

I think most of us do still use 2.5.4a, but it'd probably be a good idea
to check out 2.5.33 and see if it can be made to not generate warnings.
I'm certainly tired of seeing the warnings 2.5.4a creates ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "plabrh1"
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007)
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option