Re: One transaction and several processes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: One transaction and several processes
Date
Msg-id 76739cbb-8de7-472a-fa28-dc81c7db18e7@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to One transaction and several processes  (Valery Kuzmin <valerij.kuzmin@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/18/2018 05:31 PM, Valery Kuzmin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Can multiple processes participate in a single transaction's execution?
> I need to do the following actions sequence:
> 1. Calling service begins transaction. At this step transaction
> manager generate new XID.
> 2. Calling service updates some data.
> 3. Need to detach a transaction from a service context before other
> service is called.
> 4. Called service resume transaction using XID.
> 5. Called service updates its data.
> 6. Calling service gets control, resume transaction using XID and does commit.
> How can the third and fourth step be implemented?
> 

It's not very clear what you mean by "detaching" (and more importantly 
why you want this at all). PostgreSQL certainly does not support handing 
over regular XID to some other connection, or even keeping it active 
after the connection closes.

There are two approaches how you might achieve something similar:

1) proxy - Instead of communicating directly with the database, the 
services may communicate with a proxy that handles the actual database 
connection and communicates with the connection.

2) 2PC - Both services may do their own "private" transaction, but 
confirm it using a two-phase commit. This is more expensive than plain 
transactions and may not have exactly the same behavior, but it does 
provide the durability guarantees etc.

FWIW this question is for pgsql-general rather than pgsql-hackers.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Valery Kuzmin
Date:
Subject: One transaction and several processes
Next
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: One transaction and several processes