Re: Year 2038 Bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Date
Msg-id 766BD962-8A2D-469F-95F9-6274FF20C84C@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Year 2038 Bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Year 2038 Bug?
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:01, Tom Lane wrote:

> "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
>> Not sure if PostgreSQL uses time_t,
>
> We got rid of that some time ago.

Probably no problem, then. Do dates in PostgreSQL work for their  
entire documented ranges on 32bit processors?

Thanks,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Year 2038 Bug?