Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bossart, Nathan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands
Date
Msg-id 766556DD-AA3C-42F7-ACF4-5DC97F41F151@amazon.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 9/22/17, 10:56 AM, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I must have misunderstood.  I've attached an updated patch that
> looks more like what you described.  I also cleaned up the test cases
> a bit.

Here is a version of the patch without the switch to AutovacMemCxt in
autovacuum_do_vac_analyze(), which should no longer be necessary after
335f3d04.

Nathan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #14825: enum type: unsafe use?
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Variable substitution in psql backtick expansion