Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade
Date
Msg-id 765432.1660014469@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I thought the test was setting up a configuration that would never be
> used by normal servers.  Is that false?

*If* we made it disable autovac before starting pg_upgrade,
then that would be a process not used by normal users.
I don't care whether pg_upgrade disables autovac during its
run; that's not what's at issue here.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix unmatched file identifications
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid erroring out when unable to remove or parse logical rewrite files to save checkpoint work