On 2/14/17 1:59 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> AFAIK if you're doing make check (as opposed to installcheck) it's
>> significantly more complicated than that since you'd have to create a temp
>> cluster/install yourself.>
> But in that case you can't have useful templates in the regression test
> either, so the whole discussion is moot?
At that point it depends on what you're trying to do. Presumably
separating cluster control would make it much easier to script
createdb/dropdb as you suggested. Tom's use case might be more easily
served by specifying a template database. I don't think Pavel ever
posted his use case.
Speaking for myself, my normal pattern is to have a number of separate
pg_regress suites, each of which ends up loading the extension under
test. Loading a large extension can end up being very time consuming;
enough so that I'd expect it to be much faster to create the temp
cluster, load all the prereq's once in some template database, and then
use that template for most/all of the tests. In that scenario separating
cluster create/drop would certainly be useful, but the template option
would probably be helpful as well (though since pg_regress' diff-based
methodology just gets in my way I'd likely use some other harness to
actually run the tests).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)
