Re: [HACKERS] Large objects - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Large objects
Date
Msg-id 763061842dd62023d301321674256b61
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Large objects  (Sean Lyndersay <lynders@hcs.harvard.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
>
> The ToDo list includes the following as an enhancement in version 6.1:
>   Large objects
>       overwriting blocks has problems
>       there are other problems, too.
>       Fix large object mapping scheme
>       not to stuff everything as files in a single directory
>
> Does this mean that large objects work now? If so, is the libpq++
> testlo.cc example supposed to work?

As the maintainer of the todo list, I can say, "I don't know."

The TODO list is only a list of REPORTED problems.

- --
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

------------------------------

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Friend
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Press release, second draft
Next
From: "Vadim B. Mikheev"
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] GEQO broken on 6-6-97?!?