On 8/11/19 1:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2019-08-09 23:56, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> 1. Hierarchical semantics, where you specify the least-secure
>> acceptable method:
>>
>> password_protocol = {any,md5,scram-sha-256,scram-sha-256-plus}
>
> What would the hierarchy be if scram-sha-512 and scram-sha-512-plus are
> added?
password_protocol =
{any,md5,scram-sha-256,scram-sha-512,scram-sha-256-plus,scram-sha-512-plus}?
I'd put one length of digest over another, but I'd still rank a method
that uses channel binding has more protections than one that does not.
Jonathan
