Dear Dilip
Am 08.11.2017 um 16:15 schrieb Dilip Kumar:
> Thanks for the information, I could reproduce the issue at v10 stamp
> commit[1] and
> it's fixed at [2], I have also verified from the core dump that issue
> is same what
> got fixed at [2]
>
> [1]
> commit 5df0e99bea1c3e5fbffa7fbd0982da88ea149bb6
> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Date: Mon Oct 2 17:09:15 2017 -0400
>
> Stamp 10.0.
>
> [2]
> commit a3b1c221893f739950e9232b4b789750f247cee5
> Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
> Date: Fri Oct 13 14:53:28 2017 -0400
>
> Fix possible crash with Parallel Bitmap Heap Scan.
>
Thats great news!
Just a pitty that I invested all afternoon yesterday to fiddle together
that tiny dataset to redprouce the bug. But thats how live goes ;-)
It was still a great experience to see how prefessional and fast you
guys look at the bugs! +1 And I will test 11 RC next year!
Last question before I downgrade my PG 10 installations... The fix will
be released this week with 10.1 ?
https://www.postgresql.org/developer/roadmap/
Thanks again
Steve
--
Stefan Tzeggai
"Wer nichts zu verbergen hat, braucht auch keine Hose!"
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
