On 5/20/06, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
> I am not sure that Postgres needs CPAN. CPAN is particularly useful for
> handling dependencies. I doubt that there will be lots of dependencies in
> Postgres add ons. So having something like the current system where you
> download and build packages from source isn't going to be improved much
> with a CPAN like system.
Hmm, I was thinking rather it would be more a definitive system to look
for PgSQL extenstions and a way to encourage distributors to package
the extensions together with "mainstream" PostgreSQL. :)
Regards,
Dawid
