On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:18:53 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> > I think it is in good taste that when you find a
> > bug/vulnerability/etc first you contact the author (in this case:
> > core), leave them some time to fix the problem and then go on
> > announcing it to the
> > world.
>
> In this case, core is not the author of the object in question. And of
> course, to report a "bug/vulnerability/etc" you would write to
> pgsql-bugs, not core.
Well, if some pgsql distribution (say a Foo Package Manager packet
for FooBar *nix) has a modified pg_hba.conf then indeed this
FooBar *nix can be considered as pg_hba.conf's author.
Anyhow I still think >>core<< can be considered as original
author of pg_hba.conf default contents.
...and right you are, pgsql-bugs is the right place.
But all this discussion is getting pointless so I shall from now on
abstain from sending to this thread. ;)
Regards,
Dawid
