Re: [17] collation provider "builtin" - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: [17] collation provider "builtin"
Date
Msg-id 74712d97c9cdf014c8a34afa22b948a2e85ec69b.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [17] collation provider "builtin"  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2023-06-15 at 15:08 -0400, Joe Conway wrote:
> > I haven't studied the details yet but +1 for this idea.  It models
> > what we are actually doing.
>
> +1 agreed

I am combining this discussion with my "built-in CTYPE provider"
proposal here:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/804eb67b37f41d3afeb2b6469cbe8bfa79c562cc.camel@j-davis.com

and the most recent patch is posted there. Having a built-in provider
is more useful if it also offers a "C.UTF-8" locale that is superior to
the libc locale of the same name.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs