Heikki Linnakangas <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I have resisted having VACUUM freeze
>> tuples before they've reached a quite-respectable age, and I object to
>> having CLUSTER do it either.
> How about freezing anything older than vacuum_freeze_min_age, just like
> VACUUM does?
I suppose that'd be OK, but is it likely to be worth the trouble?
>> I could maybe accept a CLUSTER FREEZE option to do this, but that's not
>> what's in the patch.
> I wouldn't like to add more options to CLUSTER, people are already
> confused about the similar VACUUM options.
Agreed, I wasn't thrilled with that idea.
regards, tom lane
