Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Date
Msg-id 7404.1462498565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Oh, now I see why it's not here: it was back-patched into 9.5, so it
>> will not be a new feature in 9.6.0.  It will be listed in the 9.5.3
>> release notes, instead.

> I was really hoping that the OpenSSL bugfix patch would receive the
> same treatment (commit 7c7d4fddab82dc756d8caa67b1b31fcdde355aab).
> Should I take its inclusion here in the 9.6 release notes as
> portending a backpatch never happening?

No, it just means that hasn't happened yet.

> There seems to be a lack of urgency about it,

Perhaps, or maybe it's just a lack of cycles.  I certainly haven't
had any time to think about it.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial release notes created for 9.6