On 11/8/2025 06:45, Amit Kapila wrote:
> The core idea is that the leader apply worker ensures the following:
> a. Identifies dependencies between transactions. b. Coordinates
> parallel workers to apply independent transactions concurrently. c.
> Ensures correct ordering for dependent transactions.
Dependency detection may be quite an expensive operation. What about a
'positive' approach - deadlock detection on replica and, restart apply
of a record that should be applied later? Have you thought about this
way? What are the pros and cons here? Do you envision common cases where
such a deadlock will be frequent?
--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov
