Re: Year 2038 Bug? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Date
Msg-id 738808EF-B132-47F3-B437-CCEE7F043E95@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Year 2038 Bug?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Oct 13, 2008, at 11:53, Tom Lane wrote:

>> Oh. Is it not preferable to use the tzdata that ships with  
>> PostgreSQL?
>
> Not necessarily; the system might have a more up-to-date tzdata.

Gotcha.

> Generally you'd use --with-system-tzdata on a platform where you  
> expect
> to receive routine package updates for the tzdata files, independently
> of the Postgres release cycle.  It seems reasonable to assume that
> anyone currently shipping tzdata is offering 64-bit files.  (But we do
> have that regression test check in there to make sure.)

Understood. Thanks for the explanation (and the regression test!).

Best,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Year 2038 Bug?
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: TODO item: adding VERBOSE option to CLUSTER [with patch]