Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date
Msg-id 7388.1465494669@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Yes, let's fix it.  This will also take care of the questions about
>> whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require
>> module version bumps.

> Tom, there's a patch for this at
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/574F091A.3050800@proxel.se which
> I think you should review, since you were the one who made the tweaks
> involved.  Any chance you can do that RSN?  If we want to get this
> done at all, we should really get it into beta2.  Also, the patches
> Andreas posted for applying parallel-safety markings apply on top of
> that, so that needs to go in first, at least for the affected modules.

OK, I'll take it.  You're done with Andreas' patches otherwise?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Don't generate parallel paths for rels with parallel-restricted