Re: [HACKERS] compress method for spgist - 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] compress method for spgist - 2
Date
Msg-id 7349.1505949640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] compress method for spgist - 2  (Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net> writes:
> If it happens because NaN > Infinity, then the check should be not for
> isnan, but for if (low>high){swap(high, low)}.

Yeah, the same idea had occurred to me.  It'd still need a comment, but
at least it's slightly more apparent what we're trying to ensure.
        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables in VACUUM commands
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [Proposal] Allow users to specify multiple tables inVACUUM commands