Re: Vacuum nag ! - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Joris Dobbelsteen
Subject Re: Vacuum nag !
Date
Msg-id 73427AD314CC364C8DF0FFF9C4D693FF5510@nehemiah.joris2k.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum nag !  (Laurent ROCHE <laurent_roche@yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: Vacuum nag !
List pgadmin-support
I have the feeling this could be caused by pgAdmin because it is caching information. Perhaps that a refresh of the
databaseis a workarround.  

Unfortunally I'm no expert and I'm not sure about this.

- Joris

>-----Original Message-----
>From: pgadmin-support-owner@postgresql.org
>[mailto:pgadmin-support-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
>Laurent ROCHE
>Sent: donderdag 18 januari 2007 13:55
>To: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
>Subject: [pgadmin-support] Vacuum nag !
>
>Hi,
>
>I am working on an import of databases, so I keep dropping and
>re-creating schemas, and then populating tables.
>
>Even, if I do a VACUUM ANALYSE on the entire DB, PG Admin will
>prompt me to perform a VACUUM when I use one of the tables populated.
>Is this normal ?
>I would have thought that considering I have already done a
>VACUUM ANALYSE, I would not need to do it again ! ;-) ... or
>am I missing something ?
>
>I could check the "don't give me experts advice" in the
>preferences, but as I am quite a newbee in PG, I feel I need them ! ;-)
>
>
>Cheers,
>L@u
>The Computing Froggy
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________
>____________
>Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes
>vos questions !
>Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences
>des internautes sur Yahoo! Questions/Réponses
>http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
>
>---------------------------(end of
>broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so
>that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>


pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: Laurent ROCHE
Date:
Subject: Vacuum nag !
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum nag !