Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
Date
Msg-id 73199.1643831260@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 2 Feb 2022, at 19:58, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> And one thing that concretely stinks about is the progress reporting
>> you get while the tests are running:
>>
>> t/010_pg_basebackup.pl ... 142/?
>>
>> That's definitely less informative than 142/330 or whatever.

> There is that.  That's less informative, but only when looking at the tests
> while they are running.  There is no difference once the tests has finished so
> CI runs etc are no less informative.  This however is something to consider.

TBH I don't see that that's worth much.  None of our tests run so long
that you'll be sitting there trying to estimate when it'll be done.
I'd rather have the benefit of not having to maintain the test counts.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jacob Champion
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Accept IP addresses in server certificate SANs
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Refactoring SSL tests