Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I'd like to pick this patch up and see it through to commit/push.
> Presumably that will include back-patching to all supported pg versions.
> Before I go through the effort to back-patch, does anyone want to argue
> that this should *not* be back-patched?
Hm, I'm -0.5 or so. I think changing security-related behaviors
in a stable branch is a hard sell unless you are closing a security
hole. This is a fine improvement for HEAD but I'm inclined to
leave the back branches alone.
regards, tom lane
