Re: Raid 10 chunksize - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Rees
Subject Re: Raid 10 chunksize
Date
Msg-id 72dbd3150903241904t39a2304cv806b228cbaef3036@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raid 10 chunksize  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
Responses Re: Raid 10 chunksize  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com> wrote:
> Your xlogs are occasionally close to max usage too -- which is suspicious at
> 10MB/sec.  There is no reason for them to be on ext3 since they are a
> transaction log that syncs writes so file system journaling doesn't mean
> anything.  Ext2 there will lower the sync times and reduced i/o utilization.

I would tend to recommend ext3 in data=writeback and make sure that
it's mounted with noatime over using ext2 - for the sole reason that
if the system shuts down unexpectedly, you don't have to worry about a
long fsck when bringing it back up.

Performance between the two filesystems should really be negligible
for Postgres logging.

-Dave

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Carey
Date:
Subject: Re: Raid 10 chunksize
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Raid 10 chunksize