Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From David Rees
Subject Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
Date
Msg-id 72dbd3150901221341q70e57d33jce6bd8548a9279e9@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate  (Ibrahim Harrani <ibrahim.harrani@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Ibrahim Harrani
<ibrahim.harrani@gmail.com> wrote:
> Version 1.93d       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> Concurrency   1     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
> myserver 300M   391  97  9619   1  8537   2   673  99 +++++ +++  1196  16
> Latency               211ms     388ms     325ms   27652us     722us    6720ms
> Version 1.93d       ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> myserver    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
>              files  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
>                 16  9004  25 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  8246  20 +++++ +++ +++++ +++
> Latency               592ms     208us     102us     673ms     179us     100us

You should be testing bonnie with a file size that is at least double
the amount of memory in your machine - in this case, 4GB files, not
300MB files.

> When I compare my  bonnie++ result with the one at
> http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/postgresql/pg-disktesting.htm,
> It seems that there is something wrong with the disks!?

Yes, your machine appears to be very slow.  You should be able to
write in the order of 30-50MB/s+ and read in the order of 40-80MB/s+.
Random IO should be in the 200 tps range for a 7200rpm SATA RAID1.

-Dave

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ibrahim Harrani
Date:
Subject: Re: postgresql 8.3 tps rate
Next
From: Thomas Finneid
Date:
Subject: Re: caching indexes and pages?