Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christophe Pettus
Subject Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1
Date
Msg-id 72AFBD6A-D4CC-4972-9972-31F5BA7DAD48@thebuild.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Data corruption issues using streaming replication on 9.0.14/9.2.5/9.3.1  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Nov 20, 2013, at 3:57 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> On 2013-11-20 15:52:22 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Oh, so this doesn't just happen when the base backup is first taken;
>> *any* time the standby is restarted, it can happen. (!!!)
>
> Yes.

So, to be completely clear, any secondary running the affected versions which is started with hot_standby=on could
potentiallybe corrupted even if it never connects to a primary? 

--
-- Christophe Pettus  xof@thebuild.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we trust fsync?
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Can we trust fsync?