Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
> For fun, I spent some time with an AI tool to develop the attached fix for
> this problem. The explanation seems reasonable to me, although I am by no
> means a pgindent expert. When I looked at this in December, I did find
> this similar commit from upstream [0], but I failed to make the connection
> with last_u_d. 0002 is the result of a pgindent run after applying 0001.
> You'll notice that it fixes the exact set of cases I found with grep
> upthread.
Those changes are clearly improvements. I'm too tired to investigate
right now, but I wonder if we should adopt the upstream fix you
mention? (Or more generally, other changes they made since we forked?)
regards, tom lane
