On 2025/05/11 23:22, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2025-Apr-29, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>
>> jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> + /* ALTER DOMAIN <sth> ADD */
>>> + else if (Matches("ALTER", "DOMAIN", MatchAny, "ADD"))
>>> + COMPLETE_WITH("CONSTRAINT", "NOT NULL", "CHECK");
>>
>> I think the completion for CHECK should include the opening paren too,
>> since that's required for the expression.
>
> Yeah, we do that elsewhere.
>
>> We could also add completion after CONSTRAINT <name>, like this:
>>
>> else if(Matches("ALTER", "DOMAIN", MatchAny, "ADD", "CONSTRAINT", MatchAny))
>> COMPLETE_WITH("NOT NULL", "CHECK (");
>
> Done that, and pushed.
I have no objection to this commit. However, I had assumed we would
wait to commit changes like this - which aren't bug fixes or
v18-related oversights - until master becomes the development branch
for v19. Maybe I'm missing something..
We can go ahead with this one because it's a small change? Just checking,
since I have a few similar tab-completion improvements patches and
have been holding off until v19 development begins. If it's fine,
I'm thinking of committing them soon as well.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
