Re: Readd use of TAP subtests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Readd use of TAP subtests
Date
Msg-id 726c3a72-b6b2-ae0f-7d69-86bd2a5f5a2a@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Readd use of TAP subtests  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/8/21 08:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Now that subtests in TAP are supported again, I want to correct the
> great historical injustice of 7912f9b7dc9e2d3f6cd81892ef6aa797578e9f06
> and put those subtests back.
>
> Much more work like this is possible, of course.  I just wanted to get
> this out of the way since the code was already written and I've had
> this on my list for, uh, 7 years.


+many as long as we cover all the cases in Cluster.pm and Utils.pm. I
suspect they have acquired some new multi-test subs in the intervening 7
years :-)


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Readd use of TAP subtests
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: enable certain TAP tests for MSVC builds